Thursday, April 14, 2022

4/14/22

 Variable stars are selected via two methods: their periodicity (via
the Lomb-Scargle periodogram) and their general variability (via
the Stetson variability index). We identified variable stars using 3
criteria:
(i) an automated Stetson selection;
(ii) a periodic selection using the Lomb-Scargle periodogram;
and
(iii) a manual selection of light curves with high Stetson indices
but with one or more photometric error flags in each band.
Each of these selections is elaborated upon in the following subsec-
tions. We have detected 244 variable objects out of 658 analyzed
targets.

Friday, July 30, 2021

7/30/21

From mid-infrared observations of YSOs, Young et al. (2015) support ages of2Myr for IC 348 and.1Myr for NGC 1333.

Thursday, July 29, 2021

7/29/21

Our study comprises very low mass stars (.0.2) and browndwarfs (.0.08, i.e.,.80Jup) in three star-forming re-gions: the Orion Nebula Cluster (ONC), NGC 1333, and IC 348.Among young (13Myr) stars and brown dwarfs, mass is closelycorrelated with spectral type and effective temperature (eff); thehydrogen-burning limit of0.08corresponds to a spectral typeofM6 and an effective temperature of3000K (Luhman et al.2003; Luhman 2012). In the ONC, we rely on membership andeffestimations from Robberto et al. (2020); in NGC 1333 and IC 348,we rely on membership and spectral type estimates from Luhmanet al. (2016).

Wednesday, July 21, 2021

7/21/21

 Rodríguez-Ledesma et al. (2009) performed a comparison of ro-tation among both stellar and substellar-mass YSOs.

Monday, July 19, 2021

7/19/21

Variability among low-mass stars and brown dwarfs in \ic{} has been previously studied by \citet{ghosh_fast_2021}.

Thursday, July 8, 2021

7/8/21

 The shortest periods for young brown dwarfs are $\sim 1$~hr \citep{tannock_weather_2021}.

Wednesday, June 16, 2021

6/16/21

 We find 177 objects in their catalog which have the high-est confidence of cluster membership (Bayes Factor100) and an
estimated mass below 0.08. Of these 119, match within0.′′5of asource in our monitoring data. To verify that matches were sensible,we compared the meanmagnitudes of each source in our data tothe139magnitude in the Robberto et al. (2020) catalog; onlyone source had a difference of more than one magnitude betweenthese two values